The 2024 U.S. Elections: A Showdown Between the Doctrines
As the 2024 U.S. elections approach, the political landscape is set for a dramatic showdown between two prominent figures: former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris.
As the 2024 U.S. elections approach, the political landscape is set for a dramatic showdown between two prominent figures: former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris. This election is not just a contest between two individuals but a clash of ideologies that represent the broader conservative and liberal/progressive outlooks. Understanding these doctrines, their differences, and potential intersections is crucial for voters. However, it is equally important to remember that doctrines should always be questioned, and the focus should remain on the humanity of people, fostering a culture of acceptance, communication, compromise, and overall peace.
The Conservative Outlook
The conservative doctrine, as championed by Donald Trump, emphasises traditional values, limited government, and free-market principles. Conservatives advocate for the restoration of the family as the centrepiece of American life, the dismantling of the administrative state to return self-governance to the American people, and the defense of national sovereignty and borders. They stress the importance of individual rights and freedoms, as enshrined in the Constitution, and often view economic freedom as a pathway to personal and national prosperity.
Conservatives argue that intellectual sophistication and elite status should not overshadow the fundamental knowledge of what it means to live well. They believe in the wisdom of the common people and are wary of the influence of supranational organisations and treaties that may undermine national sovereignty. The conservative agenda is often framed as a battle against elite rule and woke culture, aiming to protect the American way of life from perceived threats both domestic and international.
The Liberal/Progressive Outlook
On the other hand, Kamala Harris represents the liberal/progressive doctrine, which emphasises social justice, equality, and the role of government in addressing societal issues. Progressives advocate for policies that promote inclusivity, environmental sustainability, and economic equity. They support international cooperation and treaties that address global challenges such as climate change and human rights.
Progressives believe in the power of expertise and the importance of addressing systemic inequalities through proactive government intervention. They argue that a more equitable society can be achieved by ensuring that all individuals have access to opportunities and resources, regardless of their background. The progressive agenda often includes expanding healthcare access, reforming the criminal justice system, and addressing income inequality through progressive taxation and social programs.
Differences and Possibilities of Intersection
The differences between conservative and progressive doctrines are indeed stark, rooted in fundamentally different views on the role of the individual versus the collective in society, as well as the role of government in facilitating or restricting these roles. Conservatives generally prioritise individual freedoms, particularly in economic terms, advocating for limited government intervention, free markets, and personal responsibility. They often see government as a potential threat to individual liberty, believing that people should have the maximum freedom to make their own choices, especially in economic matters like taxation, regulation, and business operations.
On the other hand, progressives emphasise social equity and the role of government in achieving it. They view government as a necessary tool to correct social and economic inequalities, provide social safety nets, and ensure that all individuals have access to the same opportunities. Progressives tend to advocate for more robust government intervention in areas such as healthcare, education, and workers' rights, arguing that these are essential to creating a fair and just society.
However, these doctrines are not entirely at odds. There are areas where they can intersect and find common ground. For instance, both conservatives and progressives recognise the importance of economic growth, though their approaches differ. Conservatives typically favor policies that reduce government regulation and lower taxes to stimulate business and investment. Progressives, while also valuing economic growth, may advocate for policies that focus on sustainable development, income redistribution, and investing in public goods like infrastructure and education to ensure that growth benefits a broader swath of society.
Another area of potential intersection is the concept of freedom. While conservatives often emphasise economic freedom—such as the freedom to start a business, keep one's earnings, or make personal financial decisions without government interference—progressives are more likely to focus on social freedoms. These include freedoms related to gender, race, and sexual orientation, and the freedom from discrimination, which they believe can be protected and promoted through government action.
Ultimately, the interplay between these doctrines is a reflection of broader societal debates about the balance between individual rights and collective responsibility, and the role of government in mediating this balance. While their starting points may be different, both conservative and progressive perspectives offer valuable insights into how to structure a society that values both freedom and fairness. The challenge lies in finding policies that can accommodate these differing priorities in a way that promotes both individual and collective well-being.
Questioning Doctrines and Focusing on Humanity
While it is essential to understand these doctrines, it is equally important not to be enamoured with either outlook blindly. Doctrines should always be questioned, and individuals should take responsibility for themselves, no matter which way they lean. Blind allegiance to any ideology can lead to polarisation and hinder constructive dialogue.
At the heart of any political discourse should be the humanity of people. Fostering a culture of acceptance, communication, compromise, and overall peace is crucial for a healthy democracy. Voters should strive to understand the perspectives of others and seek common ground, even when they disagree. This approach can help bridge the divide and promote a more inclusive and harmonious society.
Conclusion
As the 2024 elections draw near, the choice between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris represents more than just a decision between two candidates. It is a reflection of the broader ideological battle between conservative and liberal/progressive outlooks. However, voters should remember that doctrines are not infallible and should always be questioned. By focusing on the humanity of people and fostering a culture of acceptance and communication, we can navigate the complexities of political discourse and work towards a more peaceful and inclusive society.